An online community for showcasing R & Python tutorials. It operates as a networking platform for data scientists to promote their talent and get hired. Our mission is to empower data scientists by bridging the gap between talent and opportunity.

Basic Statistics

- Published on February 25, 2016 at 8:21 pm
- Updated on June 19, 2017 at 1:45 pm

- 30.4k Views
- Shares
- 5 Comments

Drawing a line through a cloud of point (ie doing a linear regression) is the most basic analysis one may do. It is sometime fitting well to the data, but in some (many) situations, the relationships between variables are not linear. In this case one may follow three different ways: (i) try to linearize the relationship by transforming the data, (ii) fit polynomial or complex spline models to the data or (iii) fit non-linear functions to the data. As you may have guessed from the title, this post will be dedicated to the third option.

In non-linear regression the analyst specify a function with a set of parameters to fit to the data. The most basic way to estimate such parameters is to use a non-linear least squares approach (function `nls`

in R) which basically approximate the non-linear function using a linear one and iteratively try to find the best parameter values (wiki). A nice feature of non-linear regression in an applied context is that the estimated parameters have a clear interpretation (Vmax in a Michaelis-Menten model is the maximum rate) which would be harder to get using linear models on transformed data for example.

First example using the Michaelis-Menten equation:

#simulate some data set.seed(20160227) x<-seq(0,50,1) y<-((runif(1,10,20)*x)/(runif(1,0,10)+x))+rnorm(51,0,1) #for simple models nls find good starting values for the parameters even if it throw a warning m<-nls(y~a*x/(b+x)) #get some estimation of goodness of fit cor(y,predict(m))[1] 0.9496598

Code below is to make a plot:

#plot plot(x,y) lines(x,predict(m),lty=2,col="red",lwd=3)

Finding good starting values is very important in non-linear regression to allow the model algorithm to converge. If you set starting parameters values completely outside of the range of potential parameter values the algorithm will either fail or it will return non-sensical parameter like for example returning a growth rate of 1000 when the actual value is 1.04.

The best way to find correct starting value is to “eyeball” the data, plotting them and based on the understanding that you have from the equation find approximate starting values for the parameters.

#simulate some data, this without a priori knowledge of the parameter value y<-runif(1,5,15)*exp(-runif(1,0.01,0.05)*x)+rnorm(51,0,0.5) #visually estimate some starting parameter values plot(x,y) #from this graph set approximate starting values a_start<-8 #param a is the y value when x=0 b_start<-2*log(2)/a_start #b is the decay rate #model m<-nls(y~a*exp(-b*x),start=list(a=a_start,b=b_start)) #get some estimation of goodness of fit cor(y,predict(m)) #plot the fit lines(x,predict(m),col="red",lty=2,lwd=3)[1] 0.9811831

It is very common for different scientific fields to use different parametrization (i.e. different equations) for the same model, one example is the logistic population growth model, in ecology we use the following form:

$$ N_{t} = \frac{K*N_{0}*e^{r*t}}{K + N_{0} * (e^{r*t} – 1)} $$

With \(N_{t}\) being the number of individuals at time \(t\), \(r\) being the population growth rate and \(K\) the carrying capacity. We can re-write this as a differential equation:

$$ dN/dt = R*N*(1-N/K) $$

library(deSolve) #simulating some population growth from the logistic equation and estimating the parameters using nls log_growth <- function(Time, State, Pars) { with(as.list(c(State, Pars)), { dN <- R*N*(1-N/K) return(list(c(dN))) }) } #the parameters for the logisitc growth pars <- c(R=0.2,K=1000) #the initial numbers N_ini <- c(N=1) #the time step to evaluate the ODE times <- seq(0, 50, by = 1) #the ODE out <- ode(N_ini, times, log_growth, pars) #add some random variation to it N_obs<-out[,2]+rnorm(51,0,50) #numbers cannot go lower than 1 N_obs<-ifelse(N_obs<1,1,N_obs) #plot plot(times,N_obs)

This part was just to simulate some data with random error, now come the tricky part to estimate the starting values.

Now R has a built-in function to estimate starting values for the parameter of a logistic equation (SSlogis) but it uses the following equation:

$$ N_{t} = \frac{alpha}{1+e^{\frac{xmid-t}{scale}}} $$

#find the parameters for the equation SS<-getInitial(N_obs~SSlogis(times,alpha,xmid,scale),data=data.frame(N_obs=N_obs,times=times))

We use the function `getInitial`

which gives some initial guesses about the parameter values based on the data. We pass to this function a selfStarting model (`SSlogis`

) which takes as argument an input vector (the t values where the function will be evaluated), and the un-quoted name of the three parameter for the logistic equation.

However as the `SSlogis`

use a different parametrization we need to use a bit of algebra to go from the estimated self-starting values returned from `SSlogis`

to the one that are in the equation we want to use.

#we used a different parametrization K_start<-SS["alpha"] R_start<-1/SS["scale"] N0_start<-SS["alpha"]/(exp(SS["xmid"]/SS["scale"])+1) #the formula for the model log_formula<-formula(N_obs~K*N0*exp(R*times)/(K+N0*(exp(R*times)-1))) #fit the model m<-nls(log_formula,start=list(K=K_start,R=R_start,N0=N0_start)) #estimated parameters summary(m) #get some estimation of goodness of fit cor(N_obs,predict(m))Formula: N_obs ~ K * N0 * exp(R * times)/(K + N0 * (exp(R * times) - 1)) Parameters: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) K 1.012e+03 3.446e+01 29.366 <2e-16 *** R 2.010e-01 1.504e-02 13.360 <2e-16 *** N0 9.600e-01 4.582e-01 2.095 0.0415 * --- Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1 Residual standard error: 49.01 on 48 degrees of freedom Number of iterations to convergence: 1 Achieved convergence tolerance: 1.537e-06 [1] 0.9910316

Lets plot it:

lines(times,predict(m),col="red",lty=2,lwd=3)

That was a bit of a hassle to get from the SSlogis parametrization to our own, but it was worth it!

In a next post we will see how to go beyond non-linear least square to embrace maximum likelihood estimation methods which are way more powerful and reliable. They allow you to build any model that you can imagine.